Login: Password: Forget password? / Register New User 
logo
Home Home | Current issue Current issue | Forum and Community Forum & Community | Onekit's Software OneKit's Software | About us About us | Live Chat with Support Team Chat with support []
Games Graphics & Design MP3 & Audio Internet & Networks System & Utilities Home & Education Business WebDev SoftDev
Reviews & Articles :: Microsoft partner: Vista less secure than XP
Issue: March 2007 > System & Utilities > Article "Microsoft partner: Vista less secure than XP"

Microsoft partner: Vista less secure than XP (Microsoft partner: Vista less secure than XP)  Microsoft partner: Vista less secure than XP

System & Utilities
Advertisement on Onekit.com Software Magazine
Security company Kaspersky claims that Vista's User Account Control (UAC), the system of user privileges that can be used to restrict users' administrative rights, will be so annoying that users will disable it.

Natalya Kaspersky, the company's chief executive, said that without UAC, Vista will be less secure than Windows XP SP2. "Windows Vista with UAC disabled will be less secure than XP SP2," said Kaspersky, speaking to ZDNet UK at the CeBIT 2007 show in Hanover. "There's a question mark if Vista security has improved, or has really dropped down."

Kaspersky provides one of the scanning engines in ForeFront, Microsoft's business security product.

Arno Edelmann, business security product manager for Microsoft, said that Kaspersky's claims were surprising. "We have a thriving community of partners, and Kasperky is one of our best partners," Edelmann told ZDNet UK. "I find their statements a little strange because they have one of the best insights into Microsoft security products."

After being roundly criticised over its security strategy in the past, Microsoft has done a lot of work to improve its approach and has been touting Vista as its most secure operating system. But Kaspersky confirmed that her analysts had found five ways to bypass Vista's UAC, and that malware writers will find more security holes.

Kaspersky also added her voice to Symantec and McAfee complaints that PatchGuard, designed to protect the Vista kernel, is hindering security companies' work.

"PatchGuard doesn't allow legitimate security vendors to do what we used to do," said Kaspersky.

Symantec has claimed that PatchGuard is hurting security vendors more than it was hurting malware writers. Bruce McCorkendale, a chief engineer at Symantec, said: "There are types of security policies and next-generation security products that can only work through some of the mechanisms that PatchGuard prohibits."

Eugene Kaspersky, the company founder, said on Thursday that while vendors had to interact with Vista legitimately, hackers were under no such constraints.

"Cybercriminals seem not to care about Vista licensing," said Eugene Kaspersky. "They don't need to follow regulations or be certified by Microsoft — antivirus vendors do."

Related Links:
March 16, 2007
Author: Tom Espiner
There are no users' comments | Post your comment
Copyright 2003-2008 - Software Magazine, onekit.com, Legal Notices
Advertisement Advertisement